Summary:
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become pervasive in modern consumer experiences, offering unprecedented convenience while simultaneously raising concerns about privacy, autonomy, and control. This study investigates the psychological and behavioral mechanisms underlying consumers’ tendency to prioritize convenience over privacy protection and examines the subtle resistance strategies individuals employ to reclaim digital autonomy. Drawing on qualitative research approach combining secondary research, over 100 semi-structured interviews, and user experience analyses across multiple platforms, including public transportation chatbots, telecom service bots, online retail distributors, rapid delivery services, and ride-hailing platforms such as Uber, the research reveals three key findings. First, convenience-driven adoption of AI is anchored in cognitive biases, such as optimism bias and status quo bias that normalize pervasive data collection and reduce perceived risks. Second, participants exhibited a state of digital resignation characterized by learned helplessness: despite high awareness of privacy intrusions, individuals felt powerless to alter entrenched digital behaviors. Third, discrete resistance strategies, including cookie rejection, private browsing, and platform switching, were largely symbolic; they provided temporary psychological reassurance but lacked efficacy against advanced tracking infrastructures. The study contributes to literature by moving beyond rational trade-off models to highlight the emotional and cognitive dimensions of digital resignation and the illusory nature of individual-level resistance. It introduces the notion of behavioral lock-in created by predictive AI models that preempt consumer decision-making. Managerially, the findings underscore the need for ethical AI design, transparent data practices, and systemic governance reforms to restore digital autonomy.
SWITCH edu-ID
Administration
