Valorisez vos réalisations phares sur People@HES-SO Plus d'infos
PEOPLE@HES-SO – Annuaire et Répertoire des compétences
PEOPLE@HES-SO – Annuaire et Répertoire des compétences

PEOPLE@HES-SO
Annuaire et Répertoire des compétences

Aide
language
  • fr
  • en
  • de
  • fr
  • en
  • de
  • SWITCH edu-ID
  • Administration
ID
« Retour
Rosset Jan

Rosset Jan

Professeur-e HES Associé-e

Compétences principales

Politiques sociales

Représentation politique

Environnement

Méthodes quantitatives

Comportement politique

Inégalités sociales

  • Contact

  • Publications

Contrat principal

Professeur-e HES Associé-e

Bureau: CBI.N107

HES-SO Valais-Wallis - HESTS
Route de la Plaine 2, 3960 Sierre, CH
HETS - VS
Domaine
Travail social (domaine)
Filière principale
Travail social

Titulaire d’un doctorat en science politique de l’Université de Lausanne, Jan Rosset a rejoint la HESTS en tant que professeur associé en politiques sociales en 2022. Avant cela, il a enseigné pendant une dizaine d’années dans les domaines de la politique comparée, des méthodes quantitatives et du comportement politique aux universités de Genève et de Lausanne. Il a occupé des postes de recherche dans ces mêmes institutions, ainsi qu’à FORS, le Centre de compétences suisse en sciences sociales, à l’Université de Mannheim et à la London School of Economics.

Ses intérêts de recherche portent sur la représentation politique, les inégalités sociales, la redistribution ainsi que, plus récemment, la politique environnementale. Il a dirigé plusieurs projets de recherche sur ces thèmes et publie régulièrement des contributions à la littérature scientifique en science politique, en administration publique et en sociologie.  

Aucune donnée à afficher pour cette section

2024

Unevenly unequal responsiveness :
Article scientifique ArODES
public opinion and redistributive policy shifts in Western Europe since 2008

Jan Rosset, Jérémie Poltier, Jonas Pontusson

Politics & society,  2024, Published online 3 november 2024

Lien vers la publication

Résumé:

Recent studies puzzle over why it is that democratically elected governments have not responded to rising inequality by engaging in more redistribution. While some scholars argue that low- and middle-income citizens have not responded to rising inequality in the way we would expect, others argue that policymakers are not responsive to the demands of these citizens. We argue that both solutions to the “lack-of-redistribution puzzle” leave something to be desired and that variation across policy domains sheds new light on the issues at stake in this debate. Based on an original 2019 survey replicating questions asked by the European Social Survey in 2008, we show that support for progressive income taxation and more egalitarian unemployment insurance has increased in most West European countries since 2008. Tax policy has moved in the same direction as public opinion, but unemployment policy has not. We conclude that public opinion should be conceived as a constraint on policymakers motivated by political-economy considerations rather than a driver of policy developments.

Is unequal representation the consequence of different voting behavior across income groups?
Article scientifique ArODES

Anna-Sophie Kurella, Nathalie Giger, Jan Rosset

Electoral Studies,  2024, vol. 89, June

Lien vers la publication

Résumé:

Extant literature documents the unequal representation of the interests of low- and high-income groups in democracies. One potential explanation for this phenomenon is the electoral behavior of different groups of voters. If affluent citizens base their vote decisions more strongly on policy considerations, while the less affluent rely on forms of electoral support that are less strongly conditioned by policy or performance evaluations, this pattern could influence the ability and willingness of political elites to represent low-income citizens. We make use of the integrated CSES election data to study how, across a diverse set of countries, income levels affect the criteria voters rely on when voting: namely, proximity voting, valence considerations, and economic voting. Overall, our findings show no meaningful differences in voting criteria across income groups, nor consequences for party systems. These findings have important implications for the literature on unequal representation, as they rule out the common narrative that the affluent cast more sophisticated vote decisions.

Bericht über die soziale Situation im Kanton Wallis :
Rapport ArODES
Oktober 2024

Jan Rosset, Maude Louviot, Marie Lequet, Lukas Schlittler, Mélodie Pralong

2024,  Siders : Hochschule und Höhere Fachschule für Soziale Arbeit HES-SO Valais-Wallis,  152 S.

Lien vers la publication

Rapport sur la situation sociale dans le canton du Valais :
Rapport ArODES
Octobre 2024

Jan Rosset, Maude Louviot, Marie Lequet, Lukas Schlittler, Mélodie Pralong

2024,  Sierre : Haute Ecole et Ecole Supérieure de Travail Social HES-SO Valais-Wallis,  152 p.

Lien vers la publication

Etude sur la situation du logement en Valais pour les personnes à faibles revenus
Rapport ArODES

Marie Lequet, Maude Louviot, Jan Rosset

2024,  Sierre : Haute Ecole et Ecole Supérieure de Travail Social de la HES-SO Valais-Wallis,  61 p.

Lien vers la publication

Studie über die Wohnsituation von Personen mit niedrigem Einkommen im Wallis
Rapport ArODES

Marie Lequet, Maude Louviot, Jan Rosset

2024,  Siders : Hochschule und Höhere Fachschule für Soziale Arbeit der HES-SO Valais-Wallis,  62 S.

Lien vers la publication

Résumé:

Die vorliegende Untersuchung gliedert sich in drei Teile. Erstens konzentriert sich die Studie darauf, die Situation der Verfügbarkeit von Mietwohnungen im Kanton und deren Kosten zu analysieren. Zweitens gibt sie einen Überblick über die Situation der in den Walliser Gemeinden umgesetzten Wohnungspolitiken (und den von diesen Gemeinden möglicherweise geäusserten Bedarf). Drittens dokumentiert sie analytisch bestimmte Politiken, die in anderen Schweizer Kantonen durchgeführt werden konnten und erörtert ihr Potenzial zur Anpassung an die Walliser Gegebenheiten. Um diese drei unterschiedlichen Ziele zu erreichen, wurden drei sich ergänzende methodische Ansätze verwendet. Der Bericht ist in drei Teile gegliedert, die den jeweiligen Schwerpunkte entsprechen.

2023

Se battre pour le climat pour bien vieillir? :
Livre ArODES
engagements civiques et politiques des sénior·e·s

Jasmine Lorenzini, Jan Rosset

2023,  Neuchâtel : Éditions Livreo-Alphil,  187 p.

Lien vers la publication

Emotions and climate strike participation among young and old demonstrators
Article scientifique ArODES

Jasmine Lorenzini, Jan Rosset

Social Movement Studies,  Published online: 05 Mar 2023

Lien vers la publication

Résumé:

Research shows that anger triggers participation in social movements, while fear inhibits action. Therefore, fear is less likely to contribute to citizens’ engagement in protest. However, in the case of climate change, fear may play a distinct role and thus contribute to participation. Given the long-term consequences of climate change, we argue that it triggers different emotions across disparate age groups. We investigate the extent to which young, adult, and senior climate strikers experience fear and anger in relation to climate change. Furthermore, we analyze the contribution of these emotions to younger and older citizens’ motivation to demonstrate. Using a unique dataset collected among climate strike demonstrators in eleven cities around the world in September 2019, we examine the importance of anger and fear in explaining motivations to take part in the demonstration – to pressure politicians or to defend one’s interests. Overall, we find that protesters aged above 60 years old are less likely to fear climate change but are more likely to feel anger in relation to this issue than younger generations. On the other hand, those aged below 35 report the highest levels of fear in relation to climate change and are significantly less angry than senior citizens. In all age groups, both anger and fear are associated with motivation to defend one’s interest and to pressure politicians.

2022

The gender gap in pro-environmental political participation among older adults
Article scientifique ArODES

Cristina El Khoury, Amédée Felix, Jasmine Lorenzini, Jan Rosset

Swiss political science review,  2022, first published online 07 december

Lien vers la publication

Résumé:

Citizens are increasingly concerned with environmental issues and some of them take contentious political actions or adapt their lifestyles to reduce their environmental footprint. Research finds that there is an eco-gender gap in everyday environmental behaviours, with women more active than men. However, studies of the eco-gender gap have infrequently looked at other forms of pro-environmental political behaviours and focused mostly on young people. We contribute to the literature by examining to what extent older women and men differ in a range of pro-environmental political behaviours, using a unique dataset based on a survey of individuals 64 years and older. We find strong evidence of a gender gap in everyday behaviours and political consumerism, but not in relation to contentious forms of political participation. This gender gap in relation to everyday behaviours and political consumerism diminishes with age.

Réalisations

Médias et communication
Nous contacter
Suivez la HES-SO
linkedin instagram facebook twitter youtube rss
univ-unita.eu www.eua.be swissuniversities.ch
Mentions légales
© 2021 - HES-SO.

HES-SO Rectorat